A two-stream pipeline where pattern pages and narrative pages have different rules, owners and SLAs. Scoped as a standalone workstream or folded into a full content managers build.
from $2,850 as a standalone workstream · included in the Content Managers Build tier
Running generated and hand-written content through one workflow makes both worse. Split the stream and both get faster. We run this as a fixed-scope workstream: 4 defined deliverables, one named approver, and a written handover at the end. It attaches to an existing content managers engagement or stands alone if that is the only piece you are missing.
Pattern stream: generate → gate → sample → publish
Narrative stream: brief → draft → edit → expert review → publish
Shared taxonomy so both streams interlink automatically
Capacity planning per stream instead of a single backlog
We look at what content managers already hold — systems, exports, APIs — and score each axis for demand and defensibility.
The data contract is written and the first template is designed against real rows, not placeholders.
450–1,050 URLs published with schema, internal links, sitemap entries and IndexNow.
Indexation and impression data decides what widens and what gets cut. Templates, gates and runbook transfer to you.
Yes at small scale, but the SLAs must stay separate or the pattern stream will always be deprioritised.
We'll audit the data source, size the first batch, set the performance budget and tell you honestly if programmatic is the wrong tool for your category.